Wow, And Scalia Is On The Supreme Court

Posted by on Jan 4, 2011 in News, Opinion, Politics | No Comments

The equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment states:

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Please read the above (called the Equal Protection Clause) again and keep it in mind when you read this exchange between Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia and California Lawyer on the issue of discrimination.

Q: In 1868, when the 39th Congress was debating and ultimately proposing the 14th Amendment, I don’t think anybody would have thought that equal protection applied to sex discrimination, or certainly not to sexual orientation. So does that mean that we’ve gone off in error by applying the 14th Amendment to both?

Scalia: Yes, yes. Sorry, to tell you that. … But, you know, if indeed the current society has come to different views, that’s fine. You do not need the Constitution to reflect the wishes of the current society. Certainly the Constitution does not require discrimination on the basis of sex. The only issue is whether it prohibits it. It doesn’t. Nobody ever thought that that’s what it meant. Nobody ever voted for that. If the current society wants to outlaw discrimination by sex, hey we have things called legislatures, and they enact things called laws. You don’t need a constitution to keep things up-to-date. All you need is a legislature and a ballot box. You don’t like the death penalty anymore, that’s fine. You want a right to abortion? There’s nothing in the Constitution about that. But that doesn’t mean you cannot prohibit it. Persuade your fellow citizens it’s a good idea and pass a law. That’s what democracy is all about. It’s not about nine superannuated judges who have been there too long, imposing these demands on society.

If you think Scalia is saying what you think he is saying you are correct. In his view the 14th Amendment offers no legal recourse if the government sanctions discrimination against women. Under Scalia’s doctrine women could be legally barred from working after having a child, driving a car, attending state-run schools, or not allowed to vote. Pretty much anything and they would be shit-out-of-luck.

Leave a Reply

This blog is kept spam free by WP-SpamFree.